Glossolalia - Wikipedia
Everyone talks about doing what the Holy Spirit says, but you do not state how you Because you can't really have a relationship unless there is true dialogue. Still uncomfortable with the big step she had just taken she thought out loud, " How . prophecy): "Do not quench the Spirit; do not despise prophetic utterances . The receiving of God's Spirit is for God's creative effort in our lives. The idea seems to be among those "charismatics," as they are called, that the . Spirit, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance. That word has practically come into the English language untranslated; it means " dialect. contrast human language to animal communication, syntax is usually taken to be . relationship between language and thought which takes place in the act of the The act of expression underlies both the encoding of an utterance in speech and the . Crushed"), and visionary imagery ("the Holy Ghost over the bent/ World.
Each unit is itself made up of syllables, the syllables being formed from consonants and vowels taken from a language known to the speaker: It is verbal behaviour that consists of using a certain number of consonants and vowels Felicitas Goodmana psychological anthropologist and linguist, also found that the speech of glossolalists reflected the patterns of speech of the speaker's native language.
Humans use language to communicate but glossolalia does not. Therefore, he concluded that glossolalia is not "a specimen of human language because it is neither internally organized nor systematically related to the world man perceives".
Felicitas Goodman studied a number of Pentecostal communities in the United States, the Caribbean, and Mexico; these included English- Spanish- and Mayan-speaking groups. She compared what she found with recordings of non-Christian rituals from Africa, Borneo, Indonesia and Japan. She took into account both the segmental structure such as sounds, syllables, phrases and the supra-segmental elements rhythm, accent, intonation and concluded that there was no distinction between what was practised by the Pentecostal Protestants and the followers of other religions.
An example is the account in the Testament of Joba non-canonical elaboration of the Book of Jobwhere the daughters of Job are described as being given sashes enabling them to speak and sing in angelic languages.
Martin, glossolalia accorded high status in the ancient world due to its association with the divine. Alexander of Abonoteichus may have exhibited glossolalia during his episodes of prophetic ecstasy. Celsus describes prophecies made by several Christians in Palestine and Phoenicia of which he writes, "Having brandished these threats they then go on to add incomprehensible, incoherent, and utterly obscure utterances, the meaning of which no intelligent person could discover: Except for Irenaeus' 2nd-century reference to many in the church speaking all kinds of languages "through the Spirit", and Tertullian's reference in AD to the spiritual gift of interpretation of tongues being encountered in his day, there are no other known first-hand accounts of glossolalia, and very few second-hand accounts among their writings.
Patrick of Ireland c. Patrick, records hearing a strange language being prayed by the Holy Spirit in a dream. Patrick says in his book: And another night — God knows, I do not, whether within me or beside me — most words which I heard and could not understand, except at the end of the speech it was represented thus: He was praying powerfully with sighs.
And in the course of this I was astonished and wondering, and I pondered who it could be who was praying within me. But at the end of the prayer it was revealed to me that it was the Spirit. And so I awoke and remembered the Apostle's words: But the Spirit Himself intercedes for us with sighs too deep for utterance [Romans 8: Her spiritual songs were referred to by contemporaries as "concerts in the Spirit.
He explained that Christ did not have this gift because his mission was to the Jews, "nor does each one of the faithful now speak save in one tongue"; for "no one speaks in the tongues of all nations, because the Church herself already speaks the languages of all nations". John Roche, a contemporary critic, claimed that the Moravians "commonly broke into some disconnected Jargon, which they often passed upon the vulgar, 'as the exuberant and resistless Evacuations of the Spirit'".
The Camisards also spoke sometimes in languages that were unknown: Edward Irving, a minister in the Church of Scotland, writes of a woman who would "speak at great length, and with superhuman strength, in an unknown tongue, to the great astonishment of all who heard, and to her own great edification and enjoyment in God".
Speaking in tongues was recorded in contemporary sources, both hostile and sympathetic to Mormonism, by at least Many other worship experiences in the Kirtland Temple prior to and after the dedication included references to people speaking and interpreting tongues. In describing the beliefs of the church in the Wentworth letterJoseph Smith identified a belief of the "gift of tongues" and "interpretation of tongues". The practice of glossolalia by the Latter-day Saints was widespread but after an initial burst of enthusiastic growth circa —34, seems to have been somewhat more restrained than in many other contemporary religious movements.
Although the Latter-day Saints believe that speaking in tongues and the interpretation of tongues are alive and well in the Church, modern Mormons are much more likely to point to the way in which LDS missionaries are trained and learn foreign languages quickly, and are able to communicate rapidly on their missions, as evidence of the manifestation of this gift. Language does not only influence memory, but also the degree of ease in learning new things Leva, Children speaking a language for example that mentions base 10 structures more clearly than for example in English learn the base 10 insight sooner.
The number of syllables the number word has also affects such aspects as remembering the phone number. Different Language, Different Thinking[ edit ] Based on such prior works as Whorf hypothesis, authors in the past have been interested in establishing whether people using different languages think differently. Would it be expected that an individual speaking English and one speaking Japanese would think differently just because of the language they use?
With Russian, the verb would connote not only the tense but also the gender. In Turkish, the same expression would give information on how the information was acquired.
This example depicts the different requirements that languages demand from their speakers. Nevertheless, do these different languages remember their experiences differently due just to their different languages?
Some scholars argue that this is so, that depending on the language; the different speakers will encode different aspects in order to apply them in their language. On the other hand, other scholars argue that linguistic utterances are wide such that just because Indonesian speakers have not included the same information as the Turkish does not meant they are not paying attention to that aspect — it only means they are not taking attention to the aspect.
The argument is that all people think the same but just talk it differently Boroditsky, Grammatical gender in languages is another aspect that shows that language influences how human beings think. In such romanticized language as Spanish, nouns can be masculine or feminine with words falling under the different gender is treated differently but those falling within the same gender being treated similarly grammatically.
This reference for example of the Russians considering a chair to be masculine and a bed to be feminine affects and shapes how the individuals think.
A word described in two languages that describe an item with one having a masculine and the other feminine word are likely to be described with different words by the two speakers even if they are being described in English, a language that has no grammatical genders. Similarly, when English speakers are grammatical gender systems, their their grammatical gender system is influenced. Another common argument is that language under specifies meaning such that meaning is much richer than the communication process.
The argument is that speakers compress their thoughts putting thoughts into languageimplying and not explicitly stating what their thoughts are whereas listeners deduce own versions from the language that is presented.
An extension of this approach in cognitive science is the concept of the language of thought or mentalese.
This suggests that when an individual wants to speak, they translate from mentalese to the spoken language. An extension of this approach is that human beings have the same cognitive architecture and mental processes thus the language of thought is universal although they express it using different languages Saeed, Multilingualism and Thought[ edit ] An important consideration is whether being bilingual or multilingual affects how an individual thinks.
Bilinguals for example change the way they perceive the world with the language they are using Leva, Shai Danziger, a cognitive psychologist who was bilingual speaking both English and Hebrews confesses that he has different reactions to the two languages. He argued that an individual could exhibit different personalities depending on the language. Expressing his opinion that English is more polite than Hebrews, he gave an example that Hebrew Speaking Israelis who speak English are likely to think differently and to be more polite for instance while driving when using English than while using Hebrews Jones, Francois Grosjean as cited in Flora, expressing similar argument however argues that thoughts can be visual-spatial and non-linguistic thus the effect of language comes into effect the moment the individual intends to speak.
Emphasizing the importance of being multilingual, Flora points out that monolinguals are underutilizing their abilities. Another aspect expressed by Flora quoting a study done in Canada is that bilingual brains are healthier as they delay the onset of dementia four years on average, enhances attention, and cognitive control in children and adults and enhances the ability to learn other languages.
Bilinguals are better at more divergent thinking for example in processing unrelated concepts and bilingual children are better able to process language at a fundamental metalinguistic level as compared to their monolingual peers Flora, Does it mean Tzeltal-speaking individuals do not understand the concepts of left and right or that those tribes in the Amazon do not understand there is more than two?
Research indicates thought can exist without language. Further evidence that language can exist before language is the magical shows by Renee Baillargeon whose stunts that defied fundamental principles of numbers resulted to young babies who had not yet acquired language to stare at those scenes more than when they stared at physically plausible ones.
Another example of existence of thought without language is in the study by Susan Goldin-Meadow on deaf children. Mental images are further provided as examples of thoughts without language. In addition, psychological studies have shown evidence of visual thinking where people can mentally manipulate images, rotate them etc.
Conclusion[ edit ] The relationship between language and thought has been a subject of debate for many years. The empirical evidence presented suggests that language shapes thinking putting to task the previously held theories on language universalism.
Through a review of literature, the conclusion is that language and thought have interactive relationship in that language dictates thought whereas thought also influences language. Further conclusions include; language organizes thought, people with different cultures and languages think differently, multilingual individuals have broader thinking as compared to monolinguals, and that thought can exist without language.
Present research in this are however is not exhaustive and thus the need for further research especially one that utilizes the new technologies in brain neurology. References[ edit ] Andrew, R. The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive science. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Key to intelligence questioned.
How does our language shape the way we think? Gorgias, sophist and artist. Can an insect speak? The case of the honeybee dance language. Social Studies of Science, 34 1 The relationship between thought and reality in cognitive semantics. What all these men need to hear both then and now is this — we are not drunk or carried away with some excess or demonic power, but this is what was prophesied by Joel.
We are in the last days, God has poured out His Spirit, and this is what it looks like Acts 2: This is the heavenly ministry of our resurrected Savior, who is the One who baptizes in the Holy Ghost and power.
This is the proof that He has received from the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit and poured out this that can be seen and heard, yet mistaken by the religious as excess and debauchery Acts 2: There are other important points that Paul makes with regard to praying and singing in the Spirit.
Paul tells the church at Ephesus not to be drunk with wine, but to be filled with the Spirit Ephesians 5: The impact of being filled with the Spirit is to speak out psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, with giving thanks to God. First it must be noted that there is no difference between being filled with the Spirit and being baptized with the Spirit. The last statement that Jesus made before He ascended up into heaven was that just as John had baptized in water, they would be baptized in the Holy Ghost Acts 1: When they were baptized, the scripture refers to it as being filled, and thus draws out an equality between the two expressions Acts 2: Being filled is pictured in Ephesians as a continuous and ongoing interaction between us and the Holy Spirit.
We are to be continually filled as much as we are to continually sing and make melody in our heart Ephesians 5: The praise and thanksgiving has many expressions, of which three categories are given here — psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs. Of most interest to us now are the spiritual songs. While others may want to impose their definition for spiritual, it is of little importance for truth seekers.
Paul uses the same word here as he did in the opening statement of 1 Corinthians Both produce the same results: Paul made it clear that praying in the Spirit was praying in tongues, because it was in direct contrast to praying with the understanding, or the language that could not be understood in the context of human languages 1 Corinthians Therefore, we have a command by the Apostle Paul that not only should there be psalms and hymns, but there should also be songs in tongues 1 Corinthians Singing in tongues is part of the divine order of the church — they do not need to be interpreted, but generally are.
Singing in tongues will lead those who do it into the inspiration of singing the new song by the Spirit. Now those who really know nothing about the operation of the baptism of the Spirit may say that this is not their experience. However, if you are unwilling to have tongues in the church, how could there ever be room for spiritual songs?
Many have been imprisoned by culture and denominational bias, and have not known the liberty of the Spirit brought to us by the Word of God. God the Holy Ghost is not going to make us do anything. If we are going to have the riches of His blessings, then we are going to earnestly desire them. We will not have any dimension of the kingdom of God that we are not hungry and thirsty for.
Paul also admonishes us not only to sing in tongues, but also to pray in tongues as well. He calls us to pray with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit Ephesians 6: Praying in the Spirit cannot be limited to praying with the understanding when Paul made it clear what he meant by praying in the Spirit in 1 Corinthians Just as he described singing in the Spirit in contrast to singing in the understanding, the same application is given for prayer.
Some will say that their translation does not capitalize the word for Spirit in 1 Corinthians If a translator does not believe that praying in the Spirit is referring to God praying through us in 1 Corinthians However, our spirits have been joined unto the Holy Spirit, and therefore when our spirit prays it is under His leadership and guidance 1 Corinthians 6: These are not the things that our spirit is inventing, but the direct utterances of the Holy Spirit praying through us Acts 2: As previously mentioned, Jude also instructed us to build up ourselves in our most holy faith, praying in the Holy Ghost Jude 1: Praying in the Holy Ghost is unique to the New Testament, and there is no reason to believe that a different meaning is being implied.
Certainly, praying in the Spirit is equivalent to praying in the Holy Ghost. This is a different kind of prayer than is typically heard coming from many whose prayers are of their own thoughts and knowledge. Praying in the Holy Ghost is God Himself praying through us.
One of the many beautiful things about praying in tongues is that we learn to yield to God the Holy Ghost in a way that bypasses our thoughts and knowledge. As we learn to yield to what the Holy Ghost is saying in tongues, we are taught to more effectively yield to Him with our understanding also.
So by practical application, if you asked anyone who does not believe in tongues to pray in the Holy Ghost, they would be at a total loss of what to do.
Psycholinguistics/Language and Thought
Praying in the Holy Ghost is a wonderful part of the new creation. The Holy Spirit Himself makes intercession through us as He prays concerning the things that we need, according to the will of the Father and the mind of Christ Romans 8: Allowing the Holy Spirit to take control of those things that we pray for with all prayer and supplication is an amazing gift Ephesians 6: Through this wonderful activity of God that infuses us with divine speech, we find ourselves operating in the mind of Christ rather than in our own limited understanding.
The heavenly and supernatural activity of the Holy Ghost praying through us will quiet our lives and still everything around us, causing us to more deeply yield ourselves to Him. Praying by the Spirit will impact every dimension of our lives, because through it we learn to yield every part of our being to Him. We are not only influenced in our thinking and ability to communicate, but also in our emotions, passions, and attitudes. Once again, the prayer of the Holy Spirit has two expressions: These two expressions of prayer should always accompany one another in those who have allowed the Holy Spirit to mature their prayer life.
We are to seek those things belonging to the kingdom of God, and prayer is one of the foremost ways that we do that. Prayer is to be the result of the Spirit of the Lord acting upon our lives. It is one of the primary responsibilities in the kingdom of Christ Jesus, and the Holy Spirit is the One who gives us the ability to know how to effectively do it.
The prayer of the Holy Spirit activates faith — mountain-moving, nation-changing, soul-winning, heaven-revealing, miracle faith John These things pertaining to the kingdom of God and the working of the Holy Spirit are supposed to be taught to us and modeled in church. Yet rarely will you find anyone who yields the meetings to the Holy Spirit in such a way. If each service was a day of Pentecost repeated, the Holy Spirit would have control, and our results and impact would be far greater.
There certainly would not only be praying in the Holy Spirit, but also singing in the Holy Spirit. Instead, we find many who persecute the move of God and want to argue about form and style.
The doctrines of men have set themselves against the prayer and praise of the Spirit in the church, calling it out of order. They argue that there needs to be an interpreter, and that it is offensive and a stumbling block. Yet, they have no similitude of the order of which they speak. These so-called defenders of the faith do not have two or three messages in tongues, and neither do they want us to have them.
We hear much about man-made order and an interpreter, but very little about someone praying in the Holy Ghost and praying with the understanding also. In so doing, many church services end up with very little manifestation of the Spirit or the kingdom of God in their meetings. Men so grieve the Holy Spirit with their hardness of heart that they have no tongue, no interpreter, and no manifestation of the Holy Spirit 1 Corinthians We must allow the fires of the Holy Spirit to burn brightly once again in the assembly of the saints.
We must throw down the idols of self-will, and allow the Holy Spirit to take control of our lives individually — and as a result, our church meetings as well. Then our obscurity and defeat will be driven back, and the light and life of Jesus will once again shine bright in a world of sin and darkness.
Then once again we will see a small but powerful church turn the world upside down Acts There must also be a place given for people to be baptized in the Holy Spirit in every meeting just as they were on the day of Pentecost, or at the house of Cornelius, or at Ephesus.
The manifestation of talking to God through praying in tongues and worshiping through singing in tongues must be promoted. Giving place for people to grow and excel through tongues so that they may also function in prophecy and interpretation of tongues must be given place. Everyone may speak in tongues at the same time as they did on the day of Pentecost and those events that followed Acts 2: Everyone may pray in tongues at the same time, just as we do when we pray with the understanding.
Everyone may sing in tongues at the same time, as we all sing any other song together. These conclusions do not contradict what Paul has to say in the rules of 1 Corinthians The primary points that Paul makes regarding the interpretation of tongues is concerning a message in tongues and its place in delivering a divine message and instruction to the people 1 Corinthians While the spiritual prayer and song are the giving forth of praise in an excellent or perfect way, those who are unlearned cannot profit from it.
As was already stated, the prayer and the song in tongues should distill into a divine utterance that everyone can profit from. The expression of tongues should turn into speech that can be understood by all. This is especially true if it is an individual praying or singing in the meeting. Peter shows us how quickly tongues will result in the revealing the secrets of the scripture that had never before been understood Acts 2: Praying in tongues will lead into praying with the understanding also.
Even though we may pray in tongues for an hour before the understanding is quickened, the results will be that which the Holy Spirit has to say. It is a wonderful blessing to sing in tongues, which then turns into a song of the understanding that the church can join along singing, and sometimes continue to sing for years.
Paul has no intention of squelching the flow of tongues in the church service. He simply makes a call for each one to have increase through the activity of the gift and excel to those utterances that can be understood.
The limits that he placed on tongues are only with respect to delivering a message 1 Corinthians Tongues Is a Language that No Man Understands There are some who would try to explain away the language of the Holy Spirit as only being needed for those who do not have the ability to speak the language of the people that they are sent to. Furthermore, such a notion is not supplied to us with respect to the many references to tongues. First of all, Paul was a Roman that was trained in the best schools of his time, and most certainly spoke the languages that were commonly used.
Paul made this point over and again as he contrasted tongues in the form of speaking, praying, or singing in the Spirit with the utterances that could be understood. If tongues were only to communicate to people in a language that the speaker did not understand, then nothing that Paul said in 1 Corinthians 14 makes any sense.
It has been argued that when men speak in tongues, they speak in the languages of men and angels as a proof that tongues are a means by which the speaker can speak the languages known to other men 1 Corinthians However, 1 Corinthians Certainly, there are no contradictions between what Paul said in chapter thirteen and what he repeated over and again in chapter fourteen.
This is certainly the proper way to understand this word in view of the Holy Spirit bringing us the spiritual language that had never been heard until the day of Pentecost. It is only the Holy Spirit who could teach this language, which Paul strongly contrasted when highlighting the differences between tongues and the languages that could be understood by men.
These are secret or hidden things that only God can understand. By definition, they would be unknown to anyone other than God, unless He chose to reveal them.
That which is being spoken in tongues is concealed to men unless there is one who makes it known through an interpretation given by the Holy Spirit. When tongues are being uttered, they are not being spoken to men, but to God.
This is one of the more important points that cannot be over emphasized 1 Corinthians This is a communion with God, not a communication with others, which further solidifies its place in church without any need for interpretation.
In fact, there is no argument given by Paul that they should not be spoken and heard in the meeting — instead the opposite is true! It has been reported from the experience of men on many different occasions that when they spoke in a tongue unknown to themselves, it was understood at least in part to some who spoke other languages. While this miraculous event is certainly not excluded, it is not what the scripture reveals about the primary nature of the language of the Spirit.
Those baptized in the Holy Spirit speak divine mysteries in the Spirit directly to God. The nature of tongues then by themselves are not intended to be revelation. It is only when there is an interpretation that makes them known that they can become revelation to the hearers, which is entirely secondary to their original function. Tongues are not inspired by the thoughts of men.
Is not personally inspired or belonging to any personal faculty of men. It is the language of the Spirit, spoken as the Holy Spirit gives utterance Acts 2: It is profitable to the speaker and not to the hearer 1 Corinthians It is the intercessions of the Holy Ghost under His control, and the speaker is only a yielded vessel by which this divine communion takes place. Someone might say that tongues is a gift, so it belongs to the individual — as though the individual becomes the administrator of the gift.
However, this is not true of any of the gifts! It is only by being yielded to the Holy Spirit that any of His manifestations will function through our lives.
Psycholinguistics/Language and Thought - Wikiversity
Just as one works miracles by the Spirit, even so one speaks in the heavenly language by the Spirit Galatians 3: Our spirits, which are joined unto the Holy Spirit, become the instrument through which the Holy Spirit expresses His thoughts 1 Corinthians 6: Interpretation of Tongues Distinct from praying, singing, and giving of thanks in the language of the Spirit, is a message in tongues.
Just as prophecy delivers a message to the church, even so there is a message that can be delivered through tongues, which is accompanied by a distinct gift that works alongside of it called the interpretation of tongues. Yet it must be emphasized that this is not the same expression of tongues that falls on everyone for prayer and singing. Anyone who has operated in the gift of tongues will recognize that there are diversities of tongues which are expressed in different ways 1 Corinthians In some instances, the moving of the Spirit touches everyone at the same time, as in Acts chapters 2, 10, and This does not necessarily happen once, but can take place throughout the meeting.
There can also be as it were waves of this Holy Ghost manifestation in which one person after another will speak in a tongue that is for a message. At other times the utterance will fall strongly upon only one person, which could either be the preacher or a person in the congregation.
When a message in tongues is given it needs to be interpreted, and of course must be done one at a time so everyone can hear what is being said by the Holy Spirit. When there is a tongue given for a message, it has a unique expression that those who are discerning recognize — context will reveal it as well. If someone is preaching and a person starts to speak in tongues, then that must be interpreted. So long as it is interpreted, it is never out of order.
What Paul is instructing for us to do in the church makes perfect sense for those who are constantly engaged in the moving of the Spirit. When everyone is praying or singing in tongues, it does not create any kind of distraction at all, but is glorious and inspiring. However, when someone wants to speak in tongues over the preacher or the one prophesying, then that creates a disruption.
If multiple people were taken by the gift of tongues and then spoke at the same time while someone began to interpret over that, then there would be confusion. The gift itself can activate the gift in those who are sensitive to the operation of the Holy Ghost, so there must be a sensitivity and respect with regards to delivering the message.
The interpretation of tongues is to be delivered like any other exhortation or sermon. It is ridiculous for those who know nothing about the practical application of the gift to suppose that they can understand all that Paul implies in 1 Corinthians 14, especially verses Furthermore, when their rules and regulations bring an end to the flow of tongues in the church, then it is obvious that they have stepped outside of the bounds set forth in scripture, and their misunderstanding is further emphasized.
There has been much confusion about the utterance of the language of the Spirit. Many good folks have some interesting preconceived ideas as to what an interpretation is supposed to look and sound like.
It does not have to work like that. The first indication of the interpretation of tongues observed in Acts 2: Those who heard what the disciples were saying in their own language did so in the context of people swept away with the utterance of tongues, which in any other circumstance would have been impossible.
The interpretation was by the assistance of a divine interpreter. Thus the miracle of interpretation rested in the hearing and not in the speaking: And how is it that we hear each in our own native language? If, as some suggest, the tongues of the Spirit were simply the languages of men given to the disciples supernaturally, then there would have been no group of people who thought that the tongues were the babblings of those drunk on wine.
If the were speaking one by one in tongues, then that was followed by an interpretation, the text would have said so — but as it stands, it reveals that they all spoke with tongues all at the same time. As they spoke, 14 different dialects were being heard by a massive audience, which is nothing short of miraculous.
Flowing in the gift of tongues is wonderful, but it cannot occupy the whole church service. If everyone were only speaking in tongues throughout the whole church service, it would be viewed by the visitor as a mad house! This is the point that Paul is driving home — tongues cannot occupy the entire service without an utterance that can be understood. In other words, the service cannot go from people praying and singing in tongues to individuals shouting out messages in tongues over each other.LANGUAGE OF THE SPIRIT - Pastor Vlad
If someone attempted to give an interpretation while others were speaking in tongues, then the interpretation would not be heard. Someone trying to interpret over others speaking in tongues would not only be confusing, but simply out of order. Each person in the context of preaching, exhorting, or prophesying should be committed to speaking words by the Holy Spirit so that everyone can understand them. Also, Paul is not limiting the number of occurrences of this manifestation, for he has already made room for everyone to participate in tongues and the interpretation of tongues.
When a message is given in tongues, the most optimal order would be to have one message in tongues, immediately followed by the interpretation. However, Paul did allow for up to 2 to 3 messages in tongues before an interpretation.
Once an interpretation was given, then there could be up to 2 to 3 additional messages given, and once again an interpretation. Paul did not place a limitation on how long this could go on — he rather praised the church because everyone had a tongue and an interpretation of tongues 1 Corinthians There certainly is no reason to believe that the tongues and interpretation of tongues, which are equal to prophecy, could not be practiced by everyone in the meeting.
The church service is not only about worshiping the Lord Jesus, but it is also about establishing the saints in the things of God and reaching the lost. Paul placed an emphasis on reaching the lost in the meeting, and therefore placed those words spoken by the understanding as far superior to those spoken in tongues 1 Corinthians Although Paul would come speaking in tongues, he would be devoted to speaking by the Spirit those words that all could understand as well 1 Corinthians There certainly is no shortage of the words that men can understand in our church meetings today, but are we hearing that message brought by the Holy Spirit through revelation knowledge, prophecy, and teachings 1 Corinthians Surely, there is no one that wants confusion.
Where many go beyond what Paul said is when they start condemning those who pray in tongues during prayer time and sing in tongues during worship. There are absolutely no restrictions placed on praying in tongues all at the same time.
Once again, this is an utterance of prayer that is not addressing men, but God 1 Corinthians If we cannot all pray in tongues at the same time, then we should not be allowed to all pray with the understanding either.
In either case, it is not for those who are listening, but for God. Who can understand what a group of people are praying in either case? According to verse 13, the one who speaks in an unknown tongue should pray that he may also interpret. Paul would not leave anyone to an expression that did not result in them excelling in the gifts.
The person who is speaking in a tongue should allow the manifestation to develop to the point that the divine speech is put into a divine message, such that the whole church can spiritually benefit and mature through it. We should note that the miraculous speech turned into a miraculous message for Peter on the day of Pentecost, and this should be the same result for us today.
Likewise, those who are functioning in the spiritual tongues should seek to excel or abound in those gifts of the Spirit that would edify the church 1 Corinthians Those gifts include more than prophecy as Paul has previously mentioned, also including revelation, knowledge, and teachings — to which we can add the word of wisdom 1 Corinthians However, if the people of the God are not allowed to operate in the spiritual, how will they ever have the opportunity to excel?
Tongues is a miracle as much as healings and all the other wonders are. These are the manifestations of the Spirit, not the manifestations of men, and they should be reverenced and appreciated as such.